<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Standard Web Page Size</title> <atom:link href="http://www.creativedevelopment.com.au/web-design/standard-web-page-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.creativedevelopment.com.au/web-design/standard-web-page-size/</link> <description>Web Development, Marketing, Branding, Growth</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://www.creativedevelopment.com.au/web-design/standard-web-page-size/comment-page-1/#comment-2208</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:09:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativedevelopment.com.au/?p=1601#comment-2208</guid> <description>I noticed the same when I looked at my stats a few weeks ago - about 2% of people still used 800 pixel screens (across a selection of sites). So I am now also working to 1000 pixels.Nice to know others think the same! I just wonder about mobile devices now!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the same when I looked at my stats a few weeks ago &#8211; about 2% of people still used 800 pixel screens (across a selection of sites). So I am now also working to 1000 pixels.</p><p>Nice to know others think the same! I just wonder about mobile devices now!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.creativedevelopment.com.au @ 2012-02-09 23:48:30 by W3 Total Cache -->
